RetraBurn Disclaimer

It appears at the foot of every page on this website and it is worth reading once rather than scrolling past twenty-six times.

A dietary supplement in the United States is not approved before it is sold. The agency does not review the formula, does not assess the evidence behind it and does not endorse a product made in a registered facility. The FDA's own questions and answers on dietary supplements states that plainly and is the page to read rather than any retailer’s paraphrase of it.

The registered-facility roundel on the pack says something narrower than most readers take from it. Registration is an administrative filing telling the agency that a factory exists, where it is and what it makes. The label’s own sentence is the better version because it is a sentence: this product has been manufactured in an FDA registered facility. Read as written, that is a statement about a building.

So the four claims printed on this bottle are structure and function statements made by the seller under its own responsibility, carried here unchanged, with the required disclaimer attached to every page that repeats them.

• Advanced weight loss support, with an asterisk tying it to the FDA statement
• Dietary supplement
• Made in the USA with globally sourced ingredients
• This product has been manufactured in an FDA registered facility

Those four lines are the whole of what the bottle says about itself, and they are the ceiling on what this website says about it.

The seller’s own information site is more energetic. It groups the formula under five headings — metabolism, energy, cravings, digestion, waistline — and puts stronger verbs in front of them. Those headings travel here as groupings, which is what they are on that page, and the benefits page handles them in that form. The verbs do not travel at all.

The practical test this desk applies to a sentence is simple: could it be read off the bottle by somebody holding it? If not, it is not written. That rule is what keeps a page about a metabolism formula from turning into a page about weight, and it is applied to the headline, the meta description and the structured data as strictly as to the body text.

Nobody at this desk is a clinician, nobody here has examined anyone, and no page on this website knows anything about your medicines.

The label’s own caution is the ceiling on what is said about safety, and it is reproduced verbatim below rather than paraphrased. Where an ingredient has a literature worth knowing about, that literature is named once, in the section whose job it is, with the paper linked beside it.

Three entries on this panel carry one. Monoammonium glycyrrhizinate is a licorice compound, and a 2026 review of licorice-induced pseudohyperaldosteronism sets out what sustained licorice intake does to blood pressure and potassium. Green tea leaf extract has a liver-injury record at concentrated doses, catalogued in the LiverTox chapter. L-tryptophan carries the eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome impurity history from 1989 onward.

All three sit inside the 15.47 mg ceiling, which makes a large exposure from this bottle unlikely rather than impossible to reason about. The figure worth adding up is your total from every source, and the side effects page is where that arithmetic is done.

This is the disclaimer that belongs to this product particularly, and it cuts both ways.

What 15.47 mg gives you. A ceiling. Whatever the split between the 21 members of the blend, not one of them can weigh more than the whole, so every published trial dose on this website can be set against that figure without knowing the split at all. Most labels in this category print no blend total, and without one no comparison of any kind can be made. Printing it was a choice somebody made and it is the reason the rest of this website has something to work with.

What it does not give you. The split. Whether maca is fourteen milligrams of that total and GABA is a rounding error, or whether all 21 are close to equal, is not published anywhere, has not been supplied to this desk, and will not be guessed at on any page here.

What a declared weight is, in the first place. A statement made at manufacture about what went into a batch. It is not an assay of what is in your bottle, not a guarantee of potency at the end of shelf life, and not a claim that the material is the same species, grade or extract the trials used. Those are four separate questions and a number on a panel answers none of them.

The chromium row is the exception that proves the shape. 7 mcg at 20% of the 35 mcg Daily Value is a complete, checkable declaration: the arithmetic works, the form is named, and anyone can compare it with the Cochrane review's 200 to 1,000 mcg a day. One row on this label supports that comparison outright. Twenty-one support it only against a ceiling.

Individual results vary, and on this product the sentence has content behind it rather than being a formality.

No trial of the finished formula exists. The review figures on this website — 4.4 out of 5 from 1,257 written reviews against 5,568 orders — are the distributor’s own summary copy, labelled as such on every page that carries them, and eight named buyers sharing three comment texts is not evidence that a formula does anything.

What food, sleep and movement do to the same measurements this panel is grouped around is larger than what a 15.47 mg blend proposes. NCCIH's page on weight control and supplements is the plain-English version of that point and is worth ten minutes.

The most useful thing this desk can say about timing is that the seller’s own roster reports later rather than sooner: the reports written after day twenty rate it higher than those written before it. Plan for 4–8 weeks rather than a fortnight, which is what the results timeline page is built around, and use the 60-day window if it is not for you.

Every citation on this website describes an ingredient. Not one of them studied this bottle, and none is cited to suggest the finished formula inherits a trial’s result.

Each was retrieved from a public database while the page was written, and the dose a trial used was read off the abstract rather than recalled. Ten such doses appear across the site. Eleven of the panel’s entries carry no dose anywhere here because no abstract read in that session stated one, and those eleven are named rather than padded.

Two pages this desk wanted to cite answer a scripted request with an error while remaining open to a human reader. They are recorded as blocked rather than quietly dropped, and a substitute that can be opened is used in their place.

Every external link opens the source itself. That is the point of them: a reader who doubts a sentence here can read the paper behind it rather than this desk’s summary of it.

Lot RET-26/TH-2877 identifies the batch this desk holds on file for the stock it ships. Certificate reference RET-2877-26-TH is the index entry under which a certificate for that batch would be filed.

Neither is a laboratory result. A certificate of analysis is a dated document naming methods, limits and findings, and it can be read. An index entry tells you a filing system exists.

No analysis document has been supplied to this desk and none is published here. What the references are genuinely good for is matching a bottle to the shipment it came from, which the order desk can do with your order ID and nobody else can. The batch verification page sets out seven checks that need nothing but the bottle.

Theretraburn earns on orders placed through the checkout reached from these pages. There is no version of this website that is independent of that.

It is printed here and at length on the about page rather than in a footnote, because a reader can only weigh the reasoning properly with the incentive in front of them. A page recommending the three-bottle pack is written by a party that benefits from a three-bottle order.

What the model does not include is worth listing as well. No subscription is sold, so nothing renews. No mailing list is built from these pages, because no server behind them could collect one. No commission is earned on anything but the product this website is about.

And the commitment that costs something: the comparison between the printed amounts and the doses the published trials used appears on the home page, the supplement facts page and the ingredients page rather than in small print.

• A dietary supplement, not a drug. Liquid drops in a 1 oz / 30 ml amber dropper bottle — not a capsule, not a gummy and not a powder.
• Not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, and not FDA-approved.
• For adults aged 18 and over. The label rules out anyone under 18 and anyone pregnant or nursing.
• One serving is 1 ml, taken once a day, and a bottle holds thirty of them. Two bottles are two months.
• Twenty-one of the twenty-two entries on the panel share one declared weight of 15.47 mg, so that figure is the ceiling on every one of them.
• The blend contains monoammonium glycyrrhizinate, a licorice compound. Licorice at sustained intake raises blood pressure and lowers potassium, which is worth knowing if you already take licorice in any other form.
• The blend also contains green tea leaf extract, which carries a liver-injury literature at concentrated doses.
• Do not exceed the dose printed on the label.
• Individual results vary. What you eat, how you sleep and how much you move all affect the same things this formula is grouped around.
• Review scores and order counts on this website are the distributor’s own summary figures, not verified transcripts and not evidence.
• Lot RET-26/TH-2877 and certificate reference RET-2877-26-TH are filing references, not laboratory proof.
• The website email cannot see orders. For a refund, call the order desk.
• The money-back guarantee is a purchase policy, not a promise about the formula.

All thirteen are gathered here so that one page carries the complete set. Individual points appear elsewhere where they are relevant — the licorice compound on side effects, the returns address on refund policy — and this is the version with nothing left out.

Storage belongs with them: keep away from heat, light, and humidity to preserve freshness. That matters more on a water-based liquid with one preservative than it would on a capsule, and it is the reason the where to buy page is careful about stock with an unknown history.